This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Sep 23 17:57:33 CEST 2014
On 23 Sep 2014, at 16:41, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote: > Question: doesn't 1 year cycle look too short? IIUC, the intention is one chair position would be up for grabs once a year. ie Sander (say) or someone else would get appointed for N years this year, assuming this proposal is accepted by the WG. Next year Gert or someone else would get appointed for N years. N would/should be the number of WG Chairs/Co-chairs. > As experienced WG chairs, could you tell us how the chair learning > curve looks like? Depends on who's doing the learning I suppose. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]