This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 23 17:41:04 CEST 2014
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Hello working group, > > The collective of RIPE working group chairpersons has decided that each RIPE > working group should have some rules regarding the re-selection of the > chairs. Gert and I have come up with the following: > > The RIPE Address Policy Working Group should attempt to maintain two > Chairpersons whenever possible. Once per year one of the chairs will > offer to stand down to allow new candidates to become chair. Question: doesn't 1 year cycle look too short? It's basically just two RIPE meetings and I believe that a new chair might need some time (at least one meeting) to get up to speed. As experienced WG chairs, could you tell us how the chair learning curve looks like? Besides that - LGTM. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]