[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Policy Proposal (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

Hi,

I support the proposal.

I'll agree with the previous about the distinction between PI and PA.
In my mind both were valid in order to get the last /22..

Regards,
George


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:

>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
> A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-606, "IPv4 Address Allocation
> and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now
> available for discussion.
>
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-04
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 3 June 2014.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140505/30fabd24/attachment.html>