[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:24:31AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> > Would this proposal allow end users to request the transfer of a single
> > IPv4 /32?
>
> Technically, yes, if a) we permit PI transfers (proposal in the works),
> and b) the RIPE NCC has given out a /32 PI.
>

If RIPE NCC has given out a /32 of PI, I'm fine with it being transferable.
 I'm more concerned about lots of people attempting to carve out and
transfer (to end users) IPV4 /32s from larger blocks.

Thanks,
Scott


>
> End users reciving PA space have no transfer rights whatsoever, that space
> can only transfered by the PA holder (= the LIR).
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140324/f0b0b04f/attachment.html>