This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hannigan, Martin
marty at akamai.com
Mon Mar 24 19:33:46 CET 2014
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:24:31AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote: >> Would this proposal allow end users to request the transfer of a single >> IPv4 /32? > > Technically, yes, if a) we permit PI transfers (proposal in the works), > and b) the RIPE NCC has given out a /32 PI. > > End users reciving PA space have no transfer rights whatsoever, that space > can only transfered by the PA holder (= the LIR). > I'm generally in support of this proposal as-is, at this time. Best, -M<
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]