[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers

On 29 Jul 2014, at 11:35, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:

> 
> On 29 Jul 2014, at 10:21, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
>> Please take your fight and accusations elsewhere.  It does not have anything
>> to do with the address policy working group.
> 
> +1000000
> 
> RIPE and the NCC should keep well out of these political matters.

Away from the political aspects: indeed! This is not the place where these things can be solved.

Away from the legal aspects, quite possibly not. There is a requirement to provide legal papers and it would be good for the RIPE NCC to seek advice on the matter without making judgement calls. I don’t think anyone wants a repeat of previous sub-optimal handling of legal and law enforcement requests by the RIPE NCC. It’s better to be on solid ground and it shouldn’t be hard to ask for legal review.

Joao

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140729/0fddb49d/attachment.sig>