This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jul 29 11:35:18 CEST 2014
On 29 Jul 2014, at 10:21, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Please take your fight and accusations elsewhere. It does not have anything > to do with the address policy working group. +1000000 RIPE and the NCC should keep well out of these political matters. It might be OK to express the obvious concerns about ending the conflict and support for humanitarian assistance. However it's hard to see how these are remotely relevant to this or any other WG. If/when a new LIR in this conflict area -- is there an existence proof of such an LIR? -- the NCC can take a pragmatic decision about whether the documentation for that new member is in order or not. Axel's already outlined the general approach.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]