This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Tue Jul 8 08:37:27 CEST 2014
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Garry Glendown <garry at nethinks.com> wrote: > On 07.07.2014 12:45, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is another topic about Last /8. >> Im seeing in the Listing Service ppl offering their last /22 from the >> 185/8 >> For example, creating a LIR on 1st January cost arround 4.000€ (more >> or less) and selling the whole allocation at currect prices (lets say, >> 8€/IP) is giving you a benefit of ~4.000€ > Generally, I'd +1 this ... > > Anyway, there may be legitimate situations where transfer of the IP > space might be permissable ... In general I would agree to this however there are many legitimate reasons to allow such transfer. And is it really such a big problem? What happen if several smaller ISP's, each with their own network and customer decide to merge... should one of them lose their /22 due to they try to grow? (and just ignore that whole they should go IPv6 because they have that) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Question about Last /8 Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]