[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:54:17PM +0200, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:
> Its then the last /8 proposal invalid since now we have more 
> than a /8? 

It is not.  The community consciously decided that as soon as the "last /8"
policy change is activated, it will *stay*, and everything else is no
longer valid.  (And, to be precise, we removed everything else from the
IPv4 policy earlier this year, because it is no longer relevant)

> Didnt read the full proposal, and to be honest, I'll probably 
> cant understand it in their totallity so if anyone can answer me that 
> would be awesome.

Do not read individual proposals to understand current policy as a whole.  

Reading proposals and mailing list threads helps understand how the policy
ended up in it's current form, but each proposal will only cover specific
areas, not "all of the policy".  So to really see what is policy today,
read the full policy document, currently ripe-606

  http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-606

as you'll see there is nothing left about "when we reach the last /8",
as this has all been taken out after it was no longer relevant.  *This*
is the policy as it is in effect right now.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140704/14180904/attachment.sig>