[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool

Hi Erik,
  I'll comment inline:
El 02/07/2014 12:56, Erik Bais escribió:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I don't see how handing out additional (free) space per LIR would solve the
> or your issue. Maybe it will solve your issue for a couple months, but not
> in the long run...
>
> The policy is clear, the reserved pool will provide a single /22 for every
> old and new LIR
Im not talking about the reserved pool. As the graph sais, there are 
Reserved Pool 0.15 /8 and Available Pool is 0.93 /8
Reserved pool is for the last /22 policy. With the actual numbers, 2490 
new LIRs can set up with a /22 allocation.
> .
>
> If you require additional IP space there are options available, but the
> final /22 provided is the final free IP space that you and every other LIR
> is going to get.
>
> If you require additional space, other options are :
> - Transfer Market
> - setup a new LIR
> - buy an existing LIR that is moving out of business.
All of them includes money, What Im trying is to be "fair" with new 
LIRs. I say fair betwen quotes becouse it wont be fair. Never. Old LIRs 
have multiple allocations, new LIRs only 1 /22 and all we pay the same 
fee. I dont care about paying the same fee, this is not the question here.
Im saying, we have almost another /8 and it could help new lirs to 
move/wait to IPv6 be fully deployed.
I know, and im not pointing anyone here, old LIRs/brokers with millions 
of address have a bussiness with the transfer market, and a new policy 
allowing new lirs to get another /22 is bad for them. Now, what is RIPE? 
A Regional Internet Registry for help Local Internet Registry or is a 
place to make lots of money with IP transfers?

If anyone replying this topic in the list have free IP allocations and 
are willing to sell or make money with them _should not_ be able to 
anwer here. Of course they will answer, and for sure, if they have free 
IP allocations and willing to sell they will not say it, but they are 
not objetives when saying: No more IP alloc than the /22 for new LIRs.
>
> And if that is not the solution for you, you need to see if CGNAT might be.
>
> I understand the issue you have and try to address, but the solution isn't
> to be found in the remaining Available IP Pool at RIPE.
> Running a new access network with only IPv6 will not fix the issue for
> today, you need to see how to overcome the period between today and when
> IPv6 will be the dominant protocol and customers don't care about v4 anymore
> because their XBOX or favorite website isn't only running on v4 anymore.
The non-expensive way to overcome the time betwen today and the day IPv6 
is the dominant protocol is giving more space to those new lirs that 
need it.

Regards,


>
> Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
>
> Hi all,
>
> As I said in this list, and since the Available IP Pool grow to near a
> /8 I want to start this topic again.
> And the question is: Should be use the Available IP Pool
> (http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-po
> ol-graph),
> what is near to a /8 (0.93 /8) to those new LIRs that only have a /22
> IPv4 allocation for another /22 (or other prefix)???
>
> Please, comment it.
>
> Regards,
>
> El 30/04/2014 12:23, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca escribió:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> I know, but before sending any proposal, and to be honest, I dont know
>> what proposal I would need to change for the use of the Reserved IP
>> Pool, I'd like to see others opinions, changes, etc...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> El 30/04/2014 12:20, Carsten Schiefner escribió:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On 30.04.2014 11:56, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:
>>>> Seems everybody stop writting with this topic, what I have changed to
>>>> "Use of the Reserved IP Pool"
>>>>
>>>> Are we going to discuss if we made an use of the Reserved IP Pool when
>>>> it reachs a non-defined-yet prefix to give at least another /22 to
>>>> those
>>>> LIRs with only 1 /22?
>>> it appears that you would need to send some text wrt. the parts of
>>> the relevant policies you would like to see changed.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>      -C.
>>>

-- 
Daniel Baeza
Centro de Observación de Red
Dpto. Internet y Telefonía
Television Costa Blanca S.L.
Telf. 966190565
WEB: http://www.tvt.es
Correo: datos at tvt-datos.es

--AVISO LEGAL--
  
En cumplimiento de la Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre de protección de datos de carácter personal, se pone en conocimiento del destinatario del presente correo electrónico, que los datos incluidos en este mensaje, están dirigidos exclusivamente al citado destinatario cuyo nombre aparece en el encabezamiento, por lo que si usted no es la persona interesada rogamos nos comunique el error de envío y se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o de los datos contenidos en el mismo o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona, procediendo a borrarlo de inmediato.
Asimismo le informamos que sus datos de correo han quedado incluidos en nuestra base de datos a fin de dirigirle, por este medio, comunicaciones comerciales, profesionales e informativas y que usted dispone de los derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y especificación de los mismos, derechos que podrá hacer efectivos dirigiéndose a Televisión Costa Blanca, S.L., C/ San Policarpo 41 Bajo. C.P: 03181 Torrevieja (Alicante).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140702/459130cc/attachment.html>