This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Tue Aug 12 09:02:02 CEST 2014
Sergey, > I see. You mentioned 37 transfers in 2014, that equal to /17,/20,/22. > Is this number significant enough to develop the policy change? I think, yes. While amont of such transfers from last /8 will increase anyway. Sergey, what is your opinion? -- Aleksei 12.08.2014 03:23 - Sergey Myasoedov написал(а): > Yes. I afaraid that last /8 will be used for creating new LIRs only reselling IPv4-adresses. As a result last /8 will be run out very fast. I see. You mentioned 37 transfers in 2014, that equal to /17,/20,/22. Is this number significant enough to develop the policy change? -- Sergey On 11 Aug 2014, at 21:49, LeaderTelecom Ltd. <info at leadertelecom.ru> wrote: > Dear Sergey, > > > I am able to read the written text :) but I don’t see the reason for your proposal. > Ok. I thinked that I wrote not very clear. > > > Or maybe you would like to limit the practice when companies being created for requesting allocation only? > > Yes. I afaraid that last /8 will be used for creating new LIRs only reselling IPv4-adresses. As a result last /8 will be run out very fast. > > If the last /8 starts from digth "185" then we can see thansfers from companies: > 23.01.2013 "TOP NET" PJSC > 15.05.2013 CallWithMe > 01.07.2013 VERIXI SPRL > 04.07.2013 PJSC "Fars Telecommunication Company" > 09.07.2013 Aria Web Development LLC > 16.10.2013 Pars Fonoun Ofogh Information Technology and Communications Company LTD > 17.12.2013 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 02.01.2014 Sara Rebollido Sueiro > 24.01.2014 NOV'IT SAS > 27.01.2014 Flex Networks Services B.V. > 27.01.2014 IPhouse B.V. > 27.01.2014 NLTM B.V. > 04.02.2014 Dark Group Ltd > 04.02.2014 Froehlich-Reisen GmbH > 05.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Skylogic Polska Sp. Z.o.o. > 28.02.2014 Netfactor Iletisim Hizmetleri Limited Sirketi > 13.03.2014 LLC Arksys > 21.03.2014 Xite Group BV > 25.03.2014 ANDRZEJ BACINSKI trading as PUMPS & SYSTEMS > 10.04.2014 LEVEL IP ITALIA S.R.L. > 29.04.2014 STIS Engineering co. LTD > 06.05.2014 Santrex Internet Services Ltd. > 08.05.2014 AnDilo AB > 13.05.2014 GLASHELDER BV > 15.05.2014 Reseau Stella SARL > 16.05.2014 Connect-it Telecom BV > 16.05.2014 Mobile Communications (MOCO) BV > 02.06.2014 A.M. Bayhan is trading as "DediColo Services" > 02.06.2014 DediColo B.V. > 04.06.2014 CLOUDGLOBAL FRANCE SAS > 06.06.2014 Optimal IT Development SRL > 20.06.2014 BIKS+ Ltd > 20.06.2014 CJSC ADVANTAGE TELECOM > 26.06.2014 International Communication company Persian Sheetsan Ltd. > 10.07.2014 TELECABLE LTD > 23.07.2014 "StoTelecom" Ltd. > 23.07.2014 Michiel Muhlenbaumer > 29.07.2014 EMY AUTO BEST SRL > 30.07.2014 Host Sailor Ltd. > 31.07.2014 Van Veen Beheer BV > 04.08.2014 WBS Consulting Czech Republic s.r.o. > > > -- > Aleksei > > 11.08.2014 21:58 - Sergey Myasoedov написал(а): > Aleksei, > I am able to read the written text :) but I don’t see the reason for your > proposal. > > Do you consider unfair single (at least in first 2 years) allocation transfer? > Why? > > Or maybe you would like to limit the practice when companies being created for > requesting allocation only? > > > -- > Sergey > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 18:09, LeaderTelecom Ltd. <info at leadertelecom.ru> wrote: > > > Sergey, > > > > > what is the point of your proposal? > > I propose don't allow transfers from last /8 during first 2 years afer date of allocation from RIPE NCC pool. > > > > Example: some LIR get IPv4 from last /8 at 11.08.2014. In period 11.08.2014 - 10.08.2016 transfer of it's IPs are not allowed. Since 11.08.2016 this LIR can transfer IPv4 to any LIR. > > > > -- > > Aleksei > > > > LL> Dear Sirs, > > > > LL> I suggest to allow transfer from the last /8 only in 2 years after date of > > LL> allocation from RIPE NCC. I see in the transfer list that this is already > > LL> common practice to transfer /22 from the last /8. > > LL> Any Pros/cons? > > > > LL> -- > > LL> Aleksei Ivanov > > LL> LeaderTelecom > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140812/080d13a5/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]