[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014072901004581] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer [...]

Dear Daniel,

> Number of (free and available) PI resources is quite low and it
> remains I think - simply due to depletion. I don't think we need
> another administrative barriers to use existing assigned address space.

If Number of (free and available) PI resources is quite low, then we will not
have any problem, but I afraid that a lot of PI resources can be free.    
For example, some companies already transfered 1mln free IPv4 addresses (QSC
AG):
https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140801190343-6692786-secrets-of-ipv4-transfers-in-ripe-region?trk=mp-edit-rr-posts
   --

 Aleksei Ivanov
LeaderTelecom

04.08.2014 15:59 - Daniel Suchy написал(а): -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4.8.2014 13:40, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote:
> It can drop amount of LIRs, while much cheaper to find PI - pay
> one time fee to owner and then return PA space and cancel contract
> as LIR. I understund difference PA & PI, but as I told - real
> customers often uses PI as PA.

Number of (free and available) PI resources is quite low and it
remains I think - simply due to depletion. I don't think we need
another administrative barriers to use existing assigned address space.

Misuse of some address space assignment is question of assignment
audit in general, I think. Transfer in general points attention to
particular LIR/address space during administrative procedure.

And as was mentioned by Gert, in APWG we basicaly haven't any reason
to care about NCC charging scheme, this is discussion for another
mailing list.

- - Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlPfdX8ACgkQ0m6yQqKjWoJjtACeM21U97y3qQexIslVJdTwT/Pc
Hu0AnirIBJdJeYtNyuyyQZZhZUyaNAht
=xxZu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140805/811214f5/attachment.html>