This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014072901004581] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer [...]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014072901004581] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Tue Aug 5 08:47:27 CEST 2014
Dear Andre, > This might work for IPv4 - you will violate policies if you still > address end-users with these addresses and risk de-registration. Do you know any fact of de-registration? > But for IPv6 this is a different story. Getting IPv6 PI space in a block that is > greater than /48 you need to provide documentation. And I doubt you can > "fake" documentiation that will give you the resources you need. If all > your competitors give customers a /48 you will want to do that as-well. > Or even with /56, there are only 256 of those in a /48. So if you want > to participate in the market you we'll need PA IPv6 and therefore need > to be a LIR anyway. IPv6 is another story. We charge very small money for IPv6 network and customers usualy use IPv6 in right way. > What is ~1300€ in your yearly budget compared to equipment, > transit/backhaul and operating costs? I would not think it is significant... Some startups have very low amount of money. -- Aleksei 04.08.2014 15:59 - Andre Keller написал(а): Hi Aleksei, On 08/04/2014 01:40 PM, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > It can drop amount of LIRs, while much cheaper to find PI - pay one time fee > to owner and then return PA space and cancel contract as LIR. I understund > difference PA & PI, but as I told - real customers often uses PI as PA. This might work for IPv4 - you will violate policies if you still address end-users with these addresses and risk de-registration. But for IPv6 this is a different story. Getting IPv6 PI space in a block that is greater than /48 you need to provide documentation. And I doubt you can "fake" documentiation that will give you the resources you need. If all your competitors give customers a /48 you will want to do that as-well. Or even with /56, there are only 256 of those in a /48. So if you want to participate in the market you we'll need PA IPv6 and therefore need to be a LIR anyway. What is ~1300€ in your yearly budget compared to equipment, transit/backhaul and operating costs? I would not think it is significant... g Andre -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140805/d5755c77/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014072901004581] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv4 PI transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]