[address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think your suggestion for going forward is constructive, and will probably
> mitigate the risk you highlighted from the impact analysis.

Personally, I feel that point 3) smells a bit like fluff. It's
well-known that changes can be proposed and implemented given
community support. Stating that in the notes on the process of such a
change seems superfluous.
Along similar lines, ensuring overall fairness is an oft-stated, and
obvious, goal.

Pointing it out again in the spirit of consensus can't hurt, either.


> I don't know what the proper procedure would be for handling this, but
> you've got my support.

Ideally, Malcolm or you would start a new PDP to implement the changes
you want to see.


-- 
Richard