This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Mon Sep 23 19:48:44 CEST 2013
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote: … (I did read it all) … > > The TL;DR is that I am now willing to withdraw my objection, but would > ask that you change the title to remove the words "No need", agree to > changes as to how this is presented externally, and to support further > work as part of a new PDP. > I think your point of view is very well expressed, and even sensible. I think your suggestion for going forward is constructive, and will probably mitigate the risk you highlighted from the impact analysis. I don't know what the proper procedure would be for handling this, but you've got my support. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130923/34f31a24/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]