This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2012-06 Revert "Run Out Fairly" implemented
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2012-06 Revert "Run Out Fairly" implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Vallerot
sylvain.vallerot at opdop.net
Wed Mar 6 11:03:13 CET 2013
Hi, Seems to me that ripe-583 and ripe-584 lack indications about the length of the period to be considered to make IPv4 PA requests. This lets some confusion here and lead to unnecessary correction work on future requests or inappropriate documentation by LIRs using their allocation windows. I suggest the "3 months", "1 year" and "2 years" formulas from ripe-381 and ripe-382 to be used again to make them more explicit. Best regards,
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal 2012-06 Revert "Run Out Fairly" implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]