[address-policy-wg] 2013-05 New Policy Proposal (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)

Dear AP WG,

in the heated discussion about 2013-03 ("no need"), I think this proposal
might have escaped your attention.

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:08:26PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote:
> A proposed change to RIPE Policy Document ripe-592, "IPv4 Address
> Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region",
> is now available for discussion.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-05/


This is an amendment to the transfer policy which solves real-world 
problems for real-world LIRs - namely: abandon the requirement that a
transferred block of addresses must be empty, because that conflicts
with real-world scenarios, like a customer of a given LIR opening
his own LIR later on, both parties agree to transfer the addresses
the customer uses to the new LIR (= the customer's LIR of the customer
using the addresses already), and the NCC then tells them "no, you 
can't do that".

The proposal is in *discussion* phase, so if you want to discuss, now is
the time.  (If you just "+1" it, that's also a clear signal :-) ).

regards,

Gert Doering,
	APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130816/431043ba/attachment.sig>