This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-05 New Policy Proposal (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Aug 14 17:48:38 CEST 2013
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Jim Reid wrote: > IIUC, in these cases the NCC generally tries to take a more pragmatic > approach. Well, that didn't seem to happen in this case. > Surely there's somebody at the original company who can put something in > writing to confirm that the address space moved when the network was > transferred all those years ago? *sigh*. Yes, that is the stance RIPE NCC has taken it seems. And when that person who *surely* exists can't be produced or won't sign because they know nothing about this, the space will be reclaimed. > For all we know an officer of that company might have been in contact > with the NCC and told a different story from the one given by the > current user of the space. Speculation doesn't really help. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-05 New Policy Proposal (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]