[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)

On 01/08/2013 18:24, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 07:38, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> «Fair use: Public IPv4 address space must be fairly distributed to the
>> End Users operating networks.»
>
> Sounds good to me!  One minor nit: can you define "fair"?

Fair means with equity, and our measure for equity is need (e.g. the contrary of waste).

Which implies a need should be evaluated. Once this evaluation is done should it be dropped to the next trash ? Writing it down in a file is easy, simple, and almost an evidence.

This file being organised with sections and filled with a bit of explanations and contexts looks like an evidence also. This is ripe-583.

So what is the problem with this file ? To me, this form is not a burocratic overhead, it is a tool is use as a guideline when making a new assignment.