[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)

> I liked the proposal initialy - but I do not buy the initial argument that since we have run
> out, conservation is not important. Since we have run out of unused addresses conservation
> is in many ways  more important - unless we belive v6 can take over.

I don't understand why people confuse the elimination of needs assessment with the elimination of conservation. Market prices are the most systemically powerful and efficient conservation mechanism ever devised. Needs assessments are a very primitive conservation mechanism: 10,000 people can all prove that they "need" as resource but that isn't helpful when only 10 of them can have it. Let's not continue this confusion.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130803/f6d3b1d7/attachment.html>