This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Sep 17 11:47:11 CEST 2012
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:31:30AM +0200, Florian Fuessl wrote:
> How about limiting IPv4 PI assignments to a total max of /12 (?) within the
> remaining /8 pool?
This sounds somewhat familiar.
"Limit IPv4 PI to all but the last /8"
Last /8 reached
"Limit IPv4 PI to just a /12 out of the last /8"
that /12 empty
"Limit IPv4 PI to another /12 out of the last /8"
... I'm not sure if "every time the available pool for X is empty, just
grab another slice of the rest and declare it to be 'available for X, but
limited!!'" is a reasonable strategy...
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]