[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

Hi,

> Vitaly Turovets wrote Sun, Sep 16, 2012 7:14 PM
> 2012/9/16 Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan at go6.si>:
> > On 9/16/12 5:54 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I support this.
> >>
> >> Also I can say the PI should be distributed as well. There are lot
> >> of companies, educational entities, small networks can't become
> >> a LIR as for money and/or formalities (bueracracy) issues.
> >
> > ...and all of them needs to be multihomed?
> >
> > Cheers, Jan
> 
> At least, some percent of those needs to.
> 
> Vitaliy Turovets

How about limiting IPv4 PI assignments to a total max of /12 (?) within the
remaining /8 pool?

Without knowing the exact statistics on IPv4 PI assignments by RIPE I guess
this could be a compromise for entities needing IPv4 PI address space within
the next time by still preserving enough resources for new members for the
coming years.

To higher the burden of possible abuse, IPv4 PI assignment requests may be
only possible after having routed IPv6 PI address space, already.

-Florian

-- 
IT Manager, Dipl.-Ing. Florian Fuessl
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DegNet GmbH            GF: Lothar Mayer            Tel  +49-991-3830566
Westl. Stadtgraben 20  AG Deggendorf HRB 2199      Fax  +49-991-3830567
94469 Deggendorf       http://www.degnet-gmbh.de   mailto>>ff at deg.net<<
-----------------------------------------------------------------------