[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> I agree with Randy and oppose this proposal. We should not use the
> last /8 for PI space but for LIRs who need at least a bit of v4 space
> to get going.

There is no distinct difference between LIR and non-LIR except paying
two grand a year.

Lets assume the simple scenario that someone wants IP Space.

Without the proposal you pay 2 grand a year and get a /22, no questions
asked.

With the Proposal you pay whatever your LIR bills you and get a /24.

I assume there will be quite some (non-ISP) Organizations who will
choose being LIR over getting a PI because they get more IP Adresses.

Without the proposal you force ALL organizations to do so.


Now, which scenario will likely run out quicker?


Rico

MfG/regards,
-- 
Rico Gloeckner

teamix GmbH
Suedwestpark 35
90449 Nuernberg

Amtsgericht Nuernberg, HRB 18320
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Oliver Kuegow, Richard Mueller