[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:52:11PM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
>IPv4 PI was never meant for that, but more for enterprises in order 
>to be able to multihome. That luxury times are over and I think that 
>the policy should reflect that.

that would be the LIR-centric view. However, I understand the intention
of the LIR system for the LIRs to be resource-management organisations
rather than a club with exclusive access to resources. Therefore an
end-user is no less "entitled" to IP resources than a LIR and 2012-04 in
current form is arbitrarily discriminationg.

rgds,
Sascha Luck