This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Sep 3 18:37:49 CEST 2012
On 9/3/12 4:30 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > We have all time of the world, as this only affects policy *after* the > IPv4 runout :-) (and there's no way to get this through before). > > This is not really aimed at "RIPE NCC address distribution", but as the > RIPE IPv4 address policy also sets the policy for "LIR to end customer > address assignment", and the *timelines* for that, it does make a > difference. Hi, apparently I misread and/or misuderstood the policy change proposal. From this point of view - it makes sense. > > To those LIRs that work operate to policy (which they all sign...), and > have some addresses left in stock... Yes. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]