This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Mon Sep 3 17:47:37 CEST 2012
Hi Jan, > I see the noble goal of this proposal - but why bother? Do we have even enough time for this proposal to become valid policy change according to all valid rules of PDP? > http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-poo l-graph > According to this graph we have one month to go. This would also apply for the transfer policies I assume. So if 2009:03 would be reverted, it would also allow transfers of larger blocks than what one might consume in 3 months. Which would be good looking at routing table size imho. Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]