[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses

Dear Gert,

> So how is this different from a sub-allocation which is then listed
> in Spamhouse?  

> I'm finding this argument difficult to understand.

When you make sub-allocation - you will receive abuses and discuss these
issues with client and cancel agreement if it was broken by client.

After temporary transfer you can't receive abuses. You don't know anything
about IPs until they will be returned back. They are not under your control. 

--
Kind regards,
Alexey Ivanov
LeaderTelecom B.V. Team

14.10.2012 16:10 - Gert Doering написал(а):
 Hi,

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:06:04PM +0400, LeaderTelecom B.V. wrote:
> > > Permanenent transfer cost [...]
>
> > Please remember that the current transfer policy explicitly states "This
> > re-allocation may be on either a permanent or non-permanent basis." so you
> can
> > already use the current transfer policy for temporary transfers.
>
>  After temporary transfer you can receive back IPs which listed in
Spamhouse.
> I don't know any company which will temporary transfers IPs.

So how is this different from a sub-allocation which is then listed in
Spamhouse?  

I'm finding this argument difficult to understand.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121014/c2fe3f19/attachment.html>