<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); ">Dear </span>Gert,<br />
<br />
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: monospace, fixed; line-height: 15px; ">> So how is this different from a sub-allocation which is then listed<br />
> in </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: monospace, fixed; line-height: 15px; ">Spamhouse? </span><br style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: monospace, fixed; line-height: 15px; " />
<br style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: monospace, fixed; line-height: 15px; " />
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: monospace, fixed; line-height: 15px; ">> I'm finding this argument difficult to understand.</span><br />
<br />
When you make sub-allocation - you will receive abuses and discuss these issues with client and cancel agreement if it was broken by client.<br />
<br />
After temporary transfer you can't receive abuses. You don't know anything about IPs until they will be returned back. They are not under your control. <br />
<br />
--<br />
Kind regards,<br />
Alexey Ivanov<br />
LeaderTelecom B.V. Team<br />
<br />
<br />
14.10.2012 16:10 - Gert Doering написал(а):<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">
Hi,<br />
<br />
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:06:04PM +0400, LeaderTelecom B.V. wrote:<br />
> > > Permanenent transfer cost [...]<br />
><br />
> > Please remember that the current transfer policy explicitly states "This<br />
> > re-allocation may be on either a permanent or non-permanent basis." so you<br />
> can<br />
> > already use the current transfer policy for temporary transfers.<br />
><br />
> After temporary transfer you can receive back IPs which listed in Spamhouse.<br />
> I don't know any company which will temporary transfers IPs.<br />
<br />
So how is this different from a sub-allocation which is then listed in<br />
Spamhouse? <br />
<br />
I'm finding this argument difficult to understand.<br />
<br />
Gert Doering<br />
-- APWG chair<br />
--<br />
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br />
<br />
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard<br />
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br />
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br />
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279</div>
</body></html>