[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses

Dear Gert,

> When this policy was initially written, there was a) no experience with
> sub-allocations, so I was careful, and b) worries that this might lead
> to LIRs sub-allocating all their space out the window, and then ending
> up in lengthy discussions with the NCC hostmasters - so a barrier was
> built in that was reasonable for the time and the envisioned usage
> ("customers that run ISP-ish businesses and need larger chunks of
> addresses to handle their customer allocations themselves").

> While we still do not have much experience with sub-allocations, the
> warning "if you hand it all out, you might not get new space easily,
> so be wary" is moot - it's now "if you hand it out, there will not be
> any more space, period!", and LIRs should have noticed *that* by now...

 I think for now all LIRs know that IPs in RIPE finished and they understand
what they do if they will sub-allocate all IPs. And may be it make sense. For
example, in Russia you need 1,5-2 years from incorporation until receving all
permissions (licenses, etc.) from goverment to provide telecommunication
services. In this case company can sub-allocate all space for some time.

--
Kind regards,
Alexey Ivanov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121011/0382d1ff/attachment.html>