This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Dopierała
undefine at aramin.net
Wed Nov 7 23:12:26 CET 2012
W dniu 07.11.2012 23:02, LeaderTelecom Ltd. pisze: > > *Allow IPv4 PI from the transfer market > > Very good idea! allow transfer between operators and allow convert from pa space to pi space. and - all will be happy :) > > -- > Alexey Ivanov > > 08.11.2012 01:57 - David Farmer написал(а): > On 11/7/12 14:17 , Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: > > Hello Gert, > > > > As Richard said, the question here is whether we should > > hand out PI from the last /8 or not. > > I think there is another viable option; > > *Allow IPv4 PI from the transfer market > > But, I by my read of RIPE policy this isn't allow, or its not clear to > me that it is allowed when I read the policy. If, I'm wrong about this > please correct me. > > If the RIPE community doesn't want to make IPv4 PI assignments out of > its last /8, I think that is defensible. If someone wants something out > of the last /8, making them become an LIR seems reasonable as well. > However, saying there is no such thing as IPv4 PI any longer is not > reasonable when there is a viable transfer market available as a source > of addresses. > > The whole point of creating a IPv4 transfer market was to encourage > getting unused or underutilized IPv4 addresses in to the hands of those > that need them. End users need for IPv4 PI is just as important and > valid of a use for IPv4 as ISP need for IPv4. Shutting IPv4 PI out of > the last /8 is one thing, shutting IPv4 PI out of the transfer market is > another and doesn't seem justified. > > > -- > ================================================= > David Farmer Email: farmer at umn.edu > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 > ================================================= > -- Regards, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121107/bdd45b41/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]