[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8

Dear Marcin,

> Without beeing yours customer for transit ?
> If yes, I suppose that you charge them for using your PA addresses.

Correct. We just registry. Most of our customers uses PI-addresses. But for
now PA-addresses instead of PI is a good option.

--
Alexey Ivanov

07.11.2012 23:28 - Marcin Kuczera написал(а):
  On 2012-11-07 14:53, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote:

  Nick,

> > /24 PA works excelent for multihome. I have a lot examples.

> I'm sure it does, until the day that the end user gets into contractual
> problems with the PA LIR and wants to move transit provider, but can't do
> so easily because they lose the addresses.  PI == provider independent.

We allow to use our PA space with any transit provider. So customers will be
provider independent.

Without beeing yours customer for transit ?
If yes, I suppose that you charge them for using your PA addresses.

Regards,
Marcin

--
Alexey Ivanov

07.11.2012 17:46 - Nick Hilliard написал(а):
 On 07/11/2012 13:34, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote:
> /24 PA works excelent for multihome. I have a lot examples.

I'm sure it does, until the day that the end user gets into contractual
problems with the PA LIR and wants to move transit provider, but can't do
so easily because they lose the addresses.  PI == provider independent.

Nick
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121108/1c360b89/attachment.html>