This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed Nov 7 15:18:48 CET 2012
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:45:55PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 07/11/2012 13:34, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > > /24 PA works excelent for multihome. I have a lot examples. > > I'm sure it does, until the day that the end user gets into contractual > problems with the PA LIR and wants to move transit provider, but can't do > so easily because they lose the addresses. PI == provider independent. But your original point was: "Because you can't multihome PA addresses." Yes, you can. ;-) Please make your mind about your arguments. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]