This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco Van Mook
Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com
Wed Nov 7 20:22:17 CET 2012
Hi Gert, I see what you're saying here. At the same time, I think any policy allowing PIv4 from the final /8 would have such a profound impact on what the current final /8 policy is trying to achieve that we should probably review the final /8 policy in its entirety. Yes, I'm fully aware how much pain and effort would go into that. But if we don't we might as well take away the fences and let everyone have a few more glorious weeks of cheap IPv4 resources. Best Remco (No hats) ----- Original Message ----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 06:17 PM To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 Hi, On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > To put it differently: Why does anyone who considers IPv4 legacy care > about how it's used up? Well, I *do* care about the way we use the community's resources in policy building. If everybody gets exhausted doing a new round of IPv4 PI policy every time the "we do IPv4 PI only until <x> happens, and then no more!" mark is reached, other policy proposals do not get the attention they deserve. (By which I'd ask you to please stay away from a PI policy that will do things like "but only in the first /9 of the last /8, not in the second /9" - *iff* the community decides to bring back IPv4 PI, then let's do it for good and for all the remaining space. Doing it for "but not for the last /x" is exactly what we have now - let's not do *that* again). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]