[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> To put it differently: Why does anyone who considers IPv4 legacy care
> about how it's used up?

Well, I *do* care about the way we use the community's resources in
policy building.  

If everybody gets exhausted doing a new round of IPv4 PI policy every 
time the "we do IPv4 PI only until <x> happens, and then no more!" mark 
is reached, other policy proposals do not get the attention they deserve.

(By which I'd ask you to please stay away from a PI policy that will
do things like "but only in the first /9 of the last /8, not in the
second /9" - *iff* the community decides to bring back IPv4 PI, then
let's do it for good and for all the remaining space.  Doing it for
"but not for the last /x" is exactly what we have now - let's not do
*that* again).

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279