[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]

Milton, 
When in result your position can become so close to B.Flame dreams I can't agree with you.

Sorry - you reminded me last discussions on Whois and last years talks about lea's expectations to minimize their spendings and to get centralized DBs with personal data on each Internet user or as it named in our country -  personal authorization in Internet .

Of course - you current talks seems are so far from this-  but what's can be behind? I hope that you can understand that there are two side of one medal and the price of free market approach can be so high for us?

Dima
PS

Sorry - it was not directly about disclosure info on transfers - it is a part of some of more general issues where this market is just a small part

Sent from my iPhone

On 03.11.2012, at 21:06, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  
> 
> For example, on stock market no one publish who sold and who bought shares. I think for safety reason. 
> [Milton L Mueller]
> One can pick a dozen other resources, ranging from acquisitions of companies to real estate transactions, where buyer and seller are documented.
> Second, even with stock exchanges, trades made by “insiders” are all documented, by name.
> Third, “safety reasons” dictate that resources held in rem are best recorded in a public exchange, so that it is more difficult to deceive anyone in the public as to who is the rightful owner of resources.
>  
> What you need to do to make your argument convincing and meaningful, Alexey, is to explain what harm is done by publishing this information.
> Tell me what “safety” issues for example are raised by people knowing that a transaction took place?
>  
> For analyse enought anonymous statistical information about transfers.
> 
> -- 
> Alexey Ivanov
> LeaderTelecom
> 
> 29.10.2012 20:27 - Emilio Madaio написал(а):
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-05 has
> been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this
> proposal has also been published.
> 
> 
> The main changes in the new version are:
> 
> -use of a bullet point layout for the proposal text;
> -anonymous reports of non-approved transfers.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at:
> 
>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05
>     
> and the draft document at:
> 
>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05/draft
> 
> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 12 November 2012.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121103/96e68d05/attachment.html>