[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]

For example, on stock market no one publish who sold and who bought shares. I think for safety reason.
[Milton L Mueller]
One can pick a dozen other resources, ranging from acquisitions of companies to real estate transactions, where buyer and seller are documented.
Second, even with stock exchanges, trades made by “insiders” are all documented, by name.
Third, “safety reasons” dictate that resources held in rem are best recorded in a public exchange, so that it is more difficult to deceive anyone in the public as to who is the rightful owner of resources.

What you need to do to make your argument convincing and meaningful, Alexey, is to explain what harm is done by publishing this information.
Tell me what “safety” issues for example are raised by people knowing that a transaction took place?

For analyse enought anonymous statistical information about transfers.

--
Alexey Ivanov
LeaderTelecom

29.10.2012 20:27 - Emilio Madaio написал(а):


Dear Colleagues,

The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-05 has
been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this
proposal has also been published.


The main changes in the new version are:

-use of a bullet point layout for the proposal text;
-anonymous reports of non-approved transfers.


You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at:

    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05

and the draft document at:

    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05/draft

We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
to address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 12 November 2012.

Regards

Emilio Madaio
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121103/4ca6575f/attachment.html>