This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue May 29 12:45:04 CEST 2012
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:12:46AM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote: > > I'm pretty sure that the RIPE NCC has said that it can't guarantee > route-ability, not that it has nothing to do with routing. Because, > frankly, that would be insane considering the whole point of > maintaining these databases of who can use which numbers is to allow > people to connect computers together on the Internet! [elided] > > -- > Shane really! thats a bit more restrictive than I remember it. I remember it as: "who can use which numbers [] to allow people to connect computers together." the "on the Internet" part is overly restrictive or was. /bill (an old skool type)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]