This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu May 24 18:12:38 CEST 2012
Shane, On May 23, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > On Thursday, 2012-05-24 07:32:02 +0900, > Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: >>> The need and the route origination must be in the RIPE NCC service >>> region. >> >> ahem! the ncc has repeatedly said over many years that it has nothing >> to do with routing. > I don't think this is true. Actually, all the RIRs have said this. > I think a more accurate claim is that the RIPE NCC has always said that > they don't guarantee that any resource you are issued can be routed. All the RIRs have also said this. > So, you may need to meet certain routing requirements to qualify for > resources. Historically, this was _not_ the case. Long, long ago, there was a bit of a dust up between the IAB and (at least some) RIR folks that resulted in RFC 1814. However, that was long ago and policies might have changed. Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]