This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 13:29:16 CEST 2012
On 29 March 2012 12:21, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Dear Address-Policy WG, > (cc'ing the EIX wg due to "this is where the proposal came from") > > after a very lifely debate in the early stages of this proposal, you > have been VERY quiet in this review phase. > > Specifically, *no* comments have been voiced, and this is not enough > for the proposal to go anywhere - so unless I see a few more comments > really soon now, we'll have to extend the review phase. I thought I saw a lot of "we support this" emails (mostly from IX operators), if not then I'll start with "I support this policy" J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]