This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon Apr 2 17:15:30 CEST 2012
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:59:55PM +0200, Chris wrote: >actually this audaciously breaches policy. Nope, not necessarily. >if ips are not required anymore, their assignment expires. if an >allocation is not needed by a lir anymore, it must be returned to >the rir. assignment != allocation Forcing a LIR to return unused /24s out of their allocation would force the LIR to de-aggregate the rest of that allocation (presumably into /24s). Of course, so does this proposal... rgds, s.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]