This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Mon Apr 2 16:59:55 CEST 2012
hi! > proposal. In general, I am opposed to the notion of monetising IP > address blocks, a la domain names. For the moment, i think I would actually this audaciously breaches policy. if ips are not required anymore, their assignment expires. if an allocation is not needed by a lir anymore, it must be returned to the rir. i'd suggest to take action to recover such ip space. to address ipv4 depletion itself, i'd suggest to reevaluate (early) allocations on compliance with current policy, favourably in steps according to the current 'state of depletion' from rir allocations from /0 (ok we might skip that and i hope maybe even the next few ;) onwards. imho this should be done concertedly at the nro level. that's actually a HUGE space we're talking about here... regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]