[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Hi Gert,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> It's worth noting that a similar PI policy has been in place in the ARIN
>> region for some time now, and has not resulted in any large increase in the
>> IPv6 routing table.
>
> Yes.  I have watched the global table fairly closely for the last years,
> and indeed, the number of PI routes in the global IPv6 table is well
> under control so far (and the rate it's growing is also under control).
>
> Slides up to May are in my RIPE62 IPv6 routing table report, but if it
> helps, I can go through the numbers and provide up-to-date graphs.

I was actually looking for you the other day on IRC... I saw a couple
of /48's in DFZ coming not from PIv6, but allocated by LIR's (thus,
announced with different origin than the /32 they came from), the
other day. IIRC, your data captured these [ easier-than-PIv6 ]
allocations as well. Is that right?

It would be interesting to see graphs of these and over time, if
possible, to try and detect and correlate changes with policy,
somehow.

Thanks,
Regards,
Martin