This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Sep 23 16:00:52 CEST 2011
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 02:15:32PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > We will ask the RIPE NCC to ask for extensive documentation in > the IPv6 PI request form about why IPv6 PI space is requested > instead of PA space. This requirement, completely negates the intent of the policy change. While it benefits a small amount of applicants (non-multihomed PIv6), it adds an unreasonable administrative burden on every other PIv6 applicant. I thus withdraw my support for this change unless the "extensive documentation" requirement is removed. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]