[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Hello Sander,

many thanks for your proposal.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hi Geza,
>
> I must admit that policy development has been very slow in some cases, but
> we also have had cases where the PDP was completed in months. But I see your
> point.
>

Thanks.


>
> But setting an arbitrary limit still feels wrong to me. How about taking
> this a bit further and reviewing policies regularly, like for example at
> every RIPE meeting? And we could review more than just the IPv6 PI policy...
>
> It will cause extra work for us as chairs, but it might be useful to do.
>
> - Sander
>

I still think it is better to set a limit with an educated guess and review
it  on the RIPE meeting...

This would allow us fexibility while the process can not become
uncontrolled. There will be no unforeseen side effects....

Thanks again,

Géza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110929/9579a8dc/attachment.html>