Hello Sander, many thanks for your proposal. <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Sander Steffann <<a href="mailto:sander@steffann.nl">sander@steffann.nl</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi Geza, I must admit that policy development has been very slow in some cases, but we also have had cases where the PDP was completed in months. But I see your point. </blockquote><div> Thanks. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> But setting an arbitrary limit still feels wrong to me. How about taking this a bit further and reviewing policies regularly, like for example at every RIPE meeting? And we could review more than just the IPv6 PI policy... It will cause extra work for us as chairs, but it might be useful to do. - Sander </blockquote><div> I still think it is better to set a limit with an educated guess and review it on the RIPE meeting... This would allow us fexibility while the process can not become uncontrolled. There will be no unforeseen side effects.... Thanks again, Géza </div></div>