This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 28 23:49:19 CEST 2011
Hello working group, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > The intention of this is to be able to analyze the reasons for organizations to request PI space and to make requesters think twice when requesting PI space. I support the policy change, even if (out of the blue for me) there is a additional burden of explaining my request for documentation. As I understood, explanations for PIv6 requests are to be documented by RIPE, but those explanations won't be a reason to reject requests if all other requirements are meet. I'd like to encourage everyone to make clear that this is optional. Nevertheless, this is not what was actually proposed, is it? regards, Dan -- danrl / Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]