[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Hi Sasha,

> Besides, the request form already contains the "why-pi" question.

So my suggestion was redundant anyway...

> A requirement to "prove that you're worthy" would just lead to applicants concocting whatever story they think the IPRA will believe and be completely useless information.

I think you misunderstood me. I wanted a (maybe bit more extensive) why-pi question. The question would be for documentation purposes only. I don't *ever* want the NCC to add a question that actually influences the decision without that being approved through the full PDP! My apologies if I created that impression.

>> Considering that this well-intended suggestion to the NCC seems to have caused controversy and distract from the actual policy proposal we will not send the suggestion to the NCC.  
> 
> Without the requirement I do, of course, fully support the policy.


Thank you expressing you opinion explicitly. That makes our lives as working group chairs so much easier!
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2084 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110923/2c770e22/attachment.p7s>