This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Sep 23 15:31:18 CEST 2011
On 23/09/2011 14:24, Sander Steffann wrote: > Someone suggested to include such documentation in IPv6 PI requests. > Because this is not actually a policy change (it doesn't change if > someone gets the address space or not) but an implementation issue we > decided to add it as a note to the RIPE NCC. I certainly suggested it as a policy possibility: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2011/msg00820.html Not sure if others talked about it too. However, there is a substantial difference between "explicitly required to provide evidence" and "to ask for extensive documentation" - the former was suggested because it does materially change the policy. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]