[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call

Hi Nick,

>> addressed. We will ask the RIPE NCC to ask for extensive documentation
>> in the IPv6 PI request form about why IPv6 PI space is requested instead
>> of PA space. 
> 
> I didn't see this mentioned in the policy proposal.  Could you explain how
> this requirement was reached in a way which is compatible with the RIPE
> Policy Development Process - i.e. by consensus and in a transparent manner?


Someone suggested to include such documentation in IPv6 PI requests. Because this is not actually a policy change (it doesn't change if someone gets the address space or not) but an implementation issue we decided to add it as a note to the RIPE NCC.

- Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2084 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110923/60a629e2/attachment.p7s>