This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 and profit/non-profit IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 and profit/non-profit IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Oct 28 15:20:41 CEST 2011
On 28 Oct 2011, at 12:51, Erik Bais wrote: > There are basically 2 types of IXP's and in order to make use of this > particular type of space, I would recommend that it would be limited > to none > commercial - not for profit - IXP's. > > This should be fairly easy for an IPRA to check. I think you vastly underestimate that task. Try coming up with watertight definitions of "for profit" and "non-profit". For bonus points, get these definitions to stand up across the NCC's service region: national variations in company law, legal entities, governance models, etc. I strongly dislike the notion of sub-typing within these special case allocations to IXPs. It adds complexity and there don't seem to be any benefits from doing so. Let's just have a policy which makes space available to IXPs and be done with it. That's already one special case too many IMO.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 and profit/non-profit IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]